member login

WebServices dot org

Todays Featured Content:

SOA testing tools advance

Mindreef and iTKO are making separate moves Tuesday in the SOA testing space. Mindreef has integrated its SOAPscope Server SOA and Web services testing software with HP Quality Center, a centralized platform for managing processes and automating software testing. ITKO is announcing availability of Lisa 4 SOA Testing, a product suite for testing SOA.

Mindreef Introduces SOAPscope Workstation for Web Services Testing, Diagnostics, Governance and Support

Mindreef product family expanded to include a cost-effective professional solution for individuals and small teams creating and maintaining high-quality web services and composite applications.

Automating What You Can’t See: Testing Middleware for the Enterprise

Read about the problems of testing SOA middleware applications and the requirements for the tools, and discover one solution that has been in use for over a year, has executed hundreds of thousands of tests, and certifies the functionality of systems that execute over a billion transactions per month.

The Foundation of SOA Quality

This paper explores the many facets of SOA Quality and the primary technology elements that make up the Foundation of SOA Quality.

Featured Content provided by Mindreef

The Continuous 'C'

John Michelsen
23rd Jan 08:

A real life experience that typified why iTKO's test strategy called the Three C’s has Complete as one of those C’s...

Several weeks back I gave you a real life experience that typified why our test strategy we call the Three C’s has Complete as one of those C’s. This blog will give you a different real-life experience on why Continuous deserves “C” status.

I was meeting with a Director of development at one of the worlds largest financial institutions. Many of their trading applications have absurd levels of complexity and variability along with, of course, radical performance expectations. Really cool stuff.

A certain critical service was running on a major SOA platform. The vendor released an update to that platform, and the team responsible for this service ran their unit and service level tests -- doing more than most teams I’ve seen. Turns out, they all passed, and in fact the service performed its main function 12 milliseconds faster -- COOL!

Then again, maybe not.

They deployed the patch and watched their entire currency trading system grind to a near halt!

Wait, you sped up the service and slowed down an application? Yes. Turns out the performance of the service prevented timing issues in the orchestration layer from surfacing in use by an application.

Of course it wasn’t obvious to the team that this was in fact the issue -- they were blaming the vendor, then their new code changes looking for how they could have wrecked the performance. They went on for days losing millions until they figured out what was really happening.

The Continuous C solves for this type of problem. Take those same tests you would automate at the orchestration and solution levels and run them on a continuous basis at those points of integration, pre-production. You’ll get immediate notice of this type of issue along with much clearer identification of the root cause.

reprinted from itko.blogspot.com


Trackback URL for this post: http://www.webservices.org/trackback/id/89358

Comments